©2025 Two Dots
At first glance, verifying rental history seems like a no-brainer. If someone paid rent on time in the past, aren't they likely to do it in the future? Unfortunately, it's not that simple. While rental history verification appears logical on the surface, the reality is that it's an expensive, time-consuming process that delivers questionable value while potentially costing you hundreds of thousands in lost revenue.
Here's why smart property managers are abandoning rental history verification—and what they're doing instead.
The core assumption behind rental history verification is that past payment behavior predicts future payment behavior. But this assumption breaks down when you examine why tenants actually default on rent.
The vast majority of people who stop paying rent don't do so because they're unwilling to pay—they do so because they can't pay. Job loss, medical emergencies, divorce, and other economic shocks are the primary drivers of rental defaults, not character flaws you could have spotted by calling a previous landlord.
If you want to measure someone's ability to pay rent going forward, you need to look at their current credit score and current income—not whether they paid rent to someone else two years ago under completely different financial circumstances.
Approximately 41% of rental units in the United States are owned by individual "mom and pop" landlords. That's over 20 million units managed by individuals who often treat rental property as a side income source. Getting these small landlords on the phone during business hours is like playing telephone tag with someone who may not even want to talk to you.
Even large commercial landlords increasingly refuse to participate in rental verifications because of the cost and liability involved. With no centralized database of rental history, you're left making cold calls to busy people who have little incentive to help you.
Picture this scenario: You're a small landlord with a nightmare tenant—late payments, noise complaints, property damage. Then someone calls asking if you'd recommend this tenant for their property.
What do you do? Tell the truth and risk being stuck with this problem tenant for even longer? Or give a glowing recommendation and finally get them out of your property?
The rational choice for most landlords is to either provide positive references (to get rid of problem tenants) or refuse to participate entirely. This means the data you're collecting is systematically biased and unreliable.
How many applicants fall into the category of having good income and good credit but somehow being terrible tenants that you'd only discover through calling previous landlords?
This intersection is vanishingly small. If someone has solid employment with verifiable income, a good credit score, and no criminal record, the probability that they're secretly a bad tenant you'd only discover through rental verification is statistically insignificant.
Industry data shows that you'll typically reach only 40-50% of previous landlords, and at best maybe 70% in ideal circumstances. If the process only works for half your applicants, what's the real value?
Slow screening processes systematically filter out your most qualified applicants. Renters with high credit scores, stable income, and pristine rental histories are the most desirable candidates for all landlords—they're also the most likely to receive multiple rapid approvals from competing properties.
When these premium applicants face several offers, their decision heavily depends on the speed of your process. A property with a 72-hour rental verification process issues an approval on day three. By then, a competitor with a 24-hour process already has that applicant's signed lease for 48 hours.
This creates a quality decay effect: slow processes systematically eliminate the best applicants from your resident pool, leaving you with second and third-choice candidates who couldn't secure faster approvals elsewhere.
According to recent Zillow data, 66% of renters submit multiple applications. These multi-property applicants are typically your most qualified prospects. They're also the fastest to sign leases elsewhere.
When rental verification adds even two days to your approval process, you fundamentally change how many applications you need to fill each unit.
Here's the breakdown for a 1,000-unit portfolio:
Key Market Reality: By Day 3, nearly half of multi-property applicants have already signed leases elsewhere. This means if you're approving on Day 3 instead of Day 1, you need 2.9 applications per open lease instead of just 2.0—that's 45% more applications needed.
Annual Impact Calculation:
1. Customer Acquisition Costs ($151,875/year)
With an average Customer Acquisition Cost of $750 per signed lease, and typically requiring 2 applications per signed lease, the cost per application is $375. Those 405 additional applications cost:
2. Extended Vacancy Costs ($134,550/year)
Each application takes an average of 5 days to source. Those additional applications mean:
Total annual cost of adding 2 days via rental verification: $286,425
Annual costs for a 1,000-unit portfolio:
Total annual impact: ~$332,175
This doesn't include hidden costs of fair housing risk or opportunity cost of staff time that could be better spent on revenue-generating activities.
Smart property managers are moving to AI-powered screening solutions that focus on what actually matters: current ability and willingness to pay.
At Two Dots, we can approve 80% or more of qualified applicants within 24 hours, with many approvals happening instantly. Our AI analysis focuses on current credit scores, income verification through modern data sources, advanced fraud detection, and comprehensive background checks.
The results speak for themselves: properties using our AI screening achieve delinquency rates far below market averages while dramatically improving occupancy rates—all without conducting a single rental history verification.
The speed advantage will only become more critical over time. As more property managers adopt instant approval technology, the industry standard for approval times will shift from days to hours—and eventually to minutes. Properties still conducting manual rental verifications will find themselves struggling to compete for quality tenants.
Ready to see how AI-powered screening can transform your leasing performance? Schedule a demo today.